And for the moment we have all been waiting for: Which scary beast do you think is more likely to exist- Big Foot or the Loch Ness Monster?
21 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Bigfoot. Maybe he's a really hairy guy (go to a NASCAR race to see some of his brothers...) who just doesn't want to be bothered by society. Maybe he's the missing link. Maybe he's Cain who killed Abel and is wandering the earth as a curse. Whatever, I think it's more likely a bigfoot exists rather than a big sea serpent.
Loch Ness the water is deep and cloudy there, plenty of room and area for it to hide. But I know Big Foot is real, I went to school with Big Foot, but contrary to popular belief Big Foot is a woman!
This is a great question. If I had to pick one I would say bigfoot. There are a lot of deep areas in the woods up north that a beast could hide in. Nessie can't exist. Are we to believe that there is a nice dinasour in that loch that only comes up occassionally and never eats anyone in the loch. There are no shy dinasours. It would be biting boats in two and eating kids constantly.
I am going to have to answer Bigfoot. As much as I love that Loch Ness Monster, its just cant exist. Bigfoot on the other hand. I mean just add a little more hair to, my brother, John Fristoe and he basically is Bigfoot. A sidenote, that "footage" of Bigfoot, I always thought that is could have been my brother, they look exactly the same.
Loch Ness is definately more believable. Especially with all the pollution in our water, there are probably alot crazier creatures than the loch ness these days.
Big Foot. Totally. I've seen Big Foot. The only ones who have seen the Loch Ness Monster are the kids on Scooby Doo. And even then it was just Old Man Rivers in a mechanical monster trying to scare people away from his castle. He would've gotten away with it too if it weren't for those meddling kids.
The Loch Ness Monster is scarier because he could drown you, which would suck. My college roommate was related to the Big Foot species and they aren't all that scary, except when he would walk around our dorm room shirtless.
Well--I'm going to have to go with Big Foot. I think the pictures are much better than the Loch Nest Monster one. Plus, I could see something being able to hide in the mountains the way that Indian Tribe in South American has been hiding out all these years (BTW that was in the news last week). My main reason is that Mr. John Fristoe Sr has called me big foot since I have known him!! Can't let my namesake down!!!
Big Foot for sure..and a whole bunch of them... but I would not call them scary... they just want to be left alone (can you really blame them) think what ppl would do to them... lab rats prolly have it better then they would...
Tough question. I guess I would have to go with Bigfoot. I figure Canada is bigger than some lake, so not being able to find Bigfoot is a lot more likely than not being able to find old Nessie.
Plus Eddie Murphy's Aunt Bunny is a bigfoot - Goonie goo goo, Gus.
Well, given that they identified the guy who created the hoax, Big Foot just isn't a viable scary beast anymore. Whereas, the mystery of the Loch Ness monster remains unsolved - I vote for it/him/her. I truly wouldn't swim in that lake.
It has to be the Loch Ness Monster....if you saw "The Waterhorse" there wouldn't be a question. Although it could just be a case of too much scotch whiskey. Besides who wants to believe in something that's big, hairy and stinky.
Loch Ness Monster. Sasquatch just seems ridiculous. We know the whole evolution of people, yet we left out the sasquatch? I don't exactly believe in Nessie, but I find it more believable.
no doubt it has to be Big Foot. I know a guy who has documentation on the beast. He resides in the Washington State area. Can get more info if you so desire.
I'll go with the loch ness monster as the one that is more likely to exist. It's much easier for someone to impersonate big foot (lives on land)) than the loch ness monster (lives in water). I'm from Florida, and I've seen plenty of hairy European guys wearing speedos at the beach that could easily be confused for bigfoot.
Definitely Bigfoot. Mostly because I don't believe in either, and I feel that there are more monkeys in the world that could be mistaken for a large man-monkey. I visited a "Bigfoot Museum" in Seattle, and it was pretty entertaining - it was owned by crazy gypsies and they had more fuzzy pictures of large monkeys in the woods than I have ever encountered in any one place. One may wonder why I visited a small basement that was clearly some sort of undercover drug ring, but such people and places must be experienced.
Well, since the guy who took the original pictures of Nessie confessed on his death bed that it was a hoax, that kind of blows the Loch Ness monster out of the water. So to speak. So I guess all we can do is hope that Big Foot is still out there somewhere.
well, this is a difficult question. at first, i automatically said the Loch Ness Monster, because it lives inderwater, so it would be harder to spot. then i thought about it, and we are fairly sure Loch Ness is confined to and area in Scotland. so if it's an area where we all know, why hasnt it been spotted yet? bigfoot we dont know where he would be, but we have recently seen him on some beef jerkey commercials, so i guess we already know he must exist.
I think it's probably more likely that some big hurting gorrilla like animal is roaming some random forest or mountain than some dinosaur thing swimming in a lake in Scotland.
Welcome to Survey of the Week, phase II. Help me make this fun for everyone and give us your best answers. Now you have the chance to defend your thoughts!
21 comments:
Bigfoot. Maybe he's a really hairy guy (go to a NASCAR race to see some of his brothers...) who just doesn't want to be bothered by society. Maybe he's the missing link. Maybe he's Cain who killed Abel and is wandering the earth as a curse. Whatever, I think it's more likely a bigfoot exists rather than a big sea serpent.
Loch Ness the water is deep and cloudy there, plenty of room and area for it to hide. But I know Big Foot is real, I went to school with Big Foot, but contrary to popular belief Big Foot is a woman!
This is a great question. If I had to pick one I would say bigfoot. There are a lot of deep areas in the woods up north that a beast could hide in. Nessie can't exist. Are we to believe that there is a nice dinasour in that loch that only comes up occassionally and never eats anyone in the loch. There are no shy dinasours. It would be biting boats in two and eating kids constantly.
I am going to have to answer Bigfoot. As much as I love that Loch Ness Monster, its just cant exist. Bigfoot on the other hand. I mean just add a little more hair to, my brother, John Fristoe and he basically is Bigfoot. A sidenote, that "footage" of Bigfoot, I always thought that is could have been my brother, they look exactly the same.
Loch Ness is definately more believable. Especially with all the pollution in our water, there are probably alot crazier creatures than the loch ness these days.
Big Foot. Totally. I've seen Big Foot. The only ones who have seen the Loch Ness Monster are the kids on Scooby Doo. And even then it was just Old Man Rivers in a mechanical monster trying to scare people away from his castle. He would've gotten away with it too if it weren't for those meddling kids.
The Loch Ness Monster is scarier because he could drown you, which would suck. My college roommate was related to the Big Foot species and they aren't all that scary, except when he would walk around our dorm room shirtless.
Big Foot, but I am not in love with the question. How about to you prefer yopur Tuna in oil or water?
Well--I'm going to have to go with Big Foot. I think the pictures are much better than the Loch Nest Monster one. Plus, I could see something being able to hide in the mountains the way that Indian Tribe in South American has been hiding out all these years (BTW that was in the news last week). My main reason is that Mr. John Fristoe Sr has called me big foot since I have known him!! Can't let my namesake down!!!
Big Foot for sure..and a whole bunch of them... but I would not call them scary... they just want to be left alone (can you really blame them) think what ppl would do to them... lab rats prolly have it better then they would...
Tough question. I guess I would have to go with Bigfoot. I figure Canada is bigger than some lake, so not being able to find Bigfoot is a lot more likely than not being able to find old Nessie.
Plus Eddie Murphy's Aunt Bunny is a bigfoot - Goonie goo goo, Gus.
Big Foot of course....Haven't we all seen Harry and the Hendersons
Well, given that they identified the guy who created the hoax, Big Foot just isn't a viable scary beast anymore. Whereas, the mystery of the Loch Ness monster remains unsolved - I vote for it/him/her. I truly wouldn't swim in that lake.
It has to be the Loch Ness Monster....if you saw "The Waterhorse" there wouldn't be a question. Although it could just be a case of too much scotch whiskey. Besides who wants to believe in something that's big, hairy and stinky.
Loch Ness Monster. Sasquatch just seems ridiculous. We know the whole evolution of people, yet we left out the sasquatch? I don't exactly believe in Nessie, but I find it more believable.
no doubt it has to be Big Foot. I know a guy who has documentation on the beast. He resides in the Washington State area. Can get more info if you so desire.
I'll go with the loch ness monster as the one that is more likely to exist. It's much easier for someone to impersonate big foot (lives on land)) than the loch ness monster (lives in water). I'm from Florida, and I've seen plenty of hairy European guys wearing speedos at the beach that could easily be confused for bigfoot.
I just threw up a little in my mouth.
Definitely Bigfoot. Mostly because I don't believe in either, and I feel that there are more monkeys in the world that could be mistaken for a large man-monkey. I visited a "Bigfoot Museum" in Seattle, and it was pretty entertaining - it was owned by crazy gypsies and they had more fuzzy pictures of large monkeys in the woods than I have ever encountered in any one place. One may wonder why I visited a small basement that was clearly some sort of undercover drug ring, but such people and places must be experienced.
Well, since the guy who took the original pictures of Nessie confessed on his death bed that it was a hoax, that kind of blows the Loch Ness monster out of the water. So to speak. So I guess all we can do is hope that Big Foot is still out there somewhere.
well, this is a difficult question. at first, i automatically said the Loch Ness Monster, because it lives inderwater, so it would be harder to spot. then i thought about it, and we are fairly sure Loch Ness is confined to and area in Scotland. so if it's an area where we all know, why hasnt it been spotted yet? bigfoot we dont know where he would be, but we have recently seen him on some beef jerkey commercials, so i guess we already know he must exist.
I think it's probably more likely that some big hurting gorrilla like animal is roaming some random forest or mountain than some dinosaur thing swimming in a lake in Scotland.
Post a Comment